@horgen: I used to think so, but often times their general reporting seems to mirror much of the rest of the MSM, which Leeds me to trust them a bit less these days. Reuters perhaps.

I guess I'm talking more about video talks shows like Breaking Points. But who knows maybe there just aren't many others yet.

Yes, this.

Some have "left" bias, but that's generally because moderate, middle-of-the-road issues are typically supported by the left and not the right (so it is more incidental than outright bias).

@horgen: It's all about what you "interact" with. The tricky part is that just stopping your scrolling on a post will register as an interaction (albeit a lower weighted one).

I trained mine by simply making sure to stop on and click the type of content I wanted to see. There will be some false positives in there because you'll naturally stop on something you didn't intend to, but your other interactions will drown them out.

@horgen: Your life is the better for it. It's a dumpster fire.

^ Elon guy, because of course

@horgen: I recently trained most of my feeds to consist primarily of Calvin and Hobbes comics and NFL off-season news, haha.

#Winning

Donnie had a rant on Truth Social today where he said he definitely has $500 million in cash.

Which is pretty weird, since a few days ago he was ranting that he would have to sell his properties in a fire sale just to appeal the decision. Oh, and his lawyers confirmed that he didn't have the money.

It must be exhausting trying to support the guy, since he lies in completely opposite ways every couple of days.

It's like the document case all over again - you know, the one where he didn't have the documents and the documents were planted but he declassified them and he only had them because he was moving and he would have given them back if he was asked but he was keeping them for his presidential library and he doesn't know what documents they were talking about?